Site Reference Forums

Hi!

Thank you all!!!  Im really glad everyone enjoyed browsing my website!

With regards to information, you are right, I need to add more information and add some sample artwork.

I will be improving it in the coming weeks.  So stay tuned!

Thanks again!

very nice website, the elegant color stone is very impressed.

Thanks again!

Simple and neat page

Linking top image would have been avoided.

It would have more impact for the viewers, if you would have used "About As" instead of "Design Concept".

Article menu would have been before Downloads.

Testimonial heading is misleading.

Being displayed the skype id in contact deatils, skype option in contact us may be removed.

Very clean looking site.  It is simple and elegent.  One thing I noticed is that your flash movies are a little slow.

wishing everyone a Happy Easter!

page not found page not found

This site is another example of bad work .. un finished .. why have you asked for a review of an unfinished site?

Get some real content freind

Ok now that a see the content on the pages it is pretty good actually

Good informative pages...

One thing i would say is some of the pages you have contain very little content. If i was you, I would take the content of the smaller pages and make a larger page with them.

Also I noticed that the titles of every page is the same. Search egnines wont know whats going on if you keep them like this. Change every title to reflect the content of the pages and write a god enticing <meta> description as this is mostly what will show up under any search results you have or get.

I see you have boxess that look like they should be clciked at the top. What I would do is turn them into buttons that lead to a small page with maybe a 50 word explanation with contextual linsk to the pages in the drop menus. this will allow people who use the tab to navigate your site to get quick access to your menu pages without going to the sitemap .. also do you have an XML site map yet ? if not get over to google and get one .. this will show youi exactly how many links you have, using the link:www.yoursite.com  is pointless as it only shows a very small percentage of links to your website.

Also i would if i was you .. which im not ... use H tags in your content so the search bots know what is important and what is not in your text based content.


After looking through your code i noticed that the boxes at the top actauly are linked to defualt.htm which dosnt actualy exist on your saite .. (404 page come up when i looked)

This is bad as the search bots will be like "erm where is this going and why do i see 6 links to t blank page ... either make a defualt.htm  or make a 404 in your htaccess document.


Im glad to see that you have added the W3C button to your site because it gave a little look behind the scenes and i found a couple of pages that didnt validate

http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http% … aphics.htm

heres one

I know they are trivial mistakes but if some one presses the button they will be like .. here this is fake!!

Apart from these points you have a good site there....

Dont know why i didnt see it the other day .. maybe a server issue

Oh b4 i got your skype page is blank


THIS IS AN EDITED IN BIT

I just looked at your News page and it saws

Design Concept Get Validated once more

Well not according to the link you have bosted via the button there

24 errors isnt valid

http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http% … 2Fnews.htm

Last edited by barry (2008-05-04 05:34:38)

Well, your site has two errors on it right now, one HTML and one CSS.

CSS:  Parse error - Unrecognized //.style1 {font-weight:normal; font-family:Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; text-align:justify; font-size:11px; font-style: normal;}

HTML: Error  Line 68, Column 9: document type does not allow element "noscript" here; missing one of "object", "applet", "map", "iframe", "button", "ins", "del" start-tag.

<noscript>

You should fix those ASAP. Anyway, I think maybe you should use a different shade of white for the boarder so you can see it on the white part of the site.

I don't like the all caps in the title. You should use normal grammar.

I also feel that there is too much white space between the third and forth paragraph. Still, I would give it 8.5/10.

Seems fast enough on my end, although there is not much in the way of image files, etc to slow it down any. Most pages loaded in under 3s.

Thanks everyone!

I have made some minor changes to the site if anyone wishes to check them out.