Site Reference Forums

Hello Sora the first sire was ok but the second site i thought was really cool if it could be as touch lighter that would be great but i like it the way it is i thought it looked kinda futuristic wish you well in your endeavor . Go sora wish you well stay positive.Went to your sites three times  the third time that 403 access did appear for what it,s worth.

Last edited by larnell (2008-05-16 03:19:40)

Houston, we have a problem.

I took another look at your page in IE6, and found a black column down the left side.  Taking a look at the css, it appears as if the problem is with #bordermaker1.  I gotta wonder why you set a transparent border of 150px wide, and made it !important.  It doesn't appear that IE6 is handling that border very well.

Another note on the fix for the button positioning, you only needed to reset the margin on the left side; doing the same thing to the top margin appears to have moved the buttons up out of alignment.

On to the reviews section.  I would definitely do something to distinguish the link to the review from the date.  Looking at your css there, I see you set the color to #005555, that doesn't stand out very much on my monitor, I'd bump it up to #007777.  I'd probably also bold the anchor and/or underline it in all modes (I'm kinda leaning toward both, but it doesn't need to be, and it's your page).  the "(new!)" tag would be nice as long as you keep track of it and remove the tag when it's no longer new.

Oh dear Allenon!

I think you've linked to the wrong page, Mate. You'd better fix it quick.

Anyone can post any rot in your name, as it stands. At least that what I think is happening. Could be mistaken.

Regards,
Laurie.

allenion wrote:

how does this site relate to your previous review
dont wont to cover the same ground !

This is the same site, just on a different host. I had to post a new topic because even though I said I changed URLs people would just click the old one and say they got a 404.


Okay, So I think I fixed the IE6 errors now and I reformatted the data layout in the reviews section. The Dark style of my site is really messed up, but I'm going to wait until I get all the errors taken care of in my main style than redo the Dark style.

I think you may have misunderstood the problem with IE6s margin problem.  It doesn't affect all margins, it only happens on floated objects (more info here: http://www.positioniseverything.net/exp … argin.html )

The only * html hack you need is the one for #sidebar, and then just the margin-left part.  The problem now is that #contentmain doesn't have a large enough margin and some of the content boxes (those that start underneath your left side menu) are overlapping your left side bar.

Last edited by Steven_A_S (2008-05-28 17:55:46)

It works now   I couldn't find any other problems in IE6 on your other pages.

If you want to go back to IE6, you can reinstall Window and your programs; and specifically prevent the updater from installing IE7.  Another way (which I haven't tried) is an installer I found here: http://tredosoft.com/Multiple_IE .

Hi Sora

I just took a look at your sits. The first one looks fine easy to read. The second one which is dark I looked at for about three seconds it hurts your eyes. I would stay with the first site.
you really don't have a sub domain sorry to say. You don't even have a domain name. Your sites are part of company called programming designs more like an affiliate program. if you type in soracrossdevelopment.com you get sight not found which means your site belongs to programming designs. if this is just a fun site for you. Then stick with programming designs. But if you're trying to start a business and make money off this  site. I would suggest you get your own Web host. There a lot of those out there. But there's only one or two that I would  recommend..

Sorry about the double post, but I just spent five hours redesigning my website. I changed the code in a lot of areas, redid the layout, and various other things. Please tell me if it's better or worse? Thank you.

Steven_A_S wrote:

I don't suppose you kept a copy of the previous version around did you?  It would help to make a comparison if we could look at both versions.

Uhhh, no. You don't remember it? o.o;;;

Well, anyway, if you can't remember it just re-review it? ^^;;